You have a star entertainer in your association. We should call her Amanda. Amanda is splendid at her employment. She's so great; actually, that you start to think, "Amanda is incredible! Envision how important she'd be in administration! Why I'll wager she could turn her whole office around!" So you elevate Amanda to an administration position. What's more, you hold up. Also, gradually however doubtlessly, you look as Amanda and her area of expertise begin to pass on. (Metaphorically talking, obviously. This isn't somewhat of an article.) What happened? Indeed, you committed a typical error and in doing as such, you coincidentally set Amanda up for disappointment. What was the oversight? You overlooked that initiative is ability. Being great even awesome at your employment doesn't naturally imply that will be great at driving others to do that, or whatever other, work. When you consider it, this bodes well, isn't that right? That is to say, you wouldn't say, "Jeff is better than average at b-ball; how about we make him a cardiovascular specialist," OK? [Note: if your answer is, "Certain, why not?" if you don't mind PLEASE let me know you are not in a position to enlist cardiovascular surgeons!] That would be outrageous, in light of the fact that they are two totally distinctive expertise sets. All things considered, so is administration. It's an aptitude set, and it's perhaps an ability set that your star entertainer doesn't have-yet. This is one of the fundamental reasons a few individuals experience difficulty when they're elevated from colleague to group pioneer. (Another reason, obviously, is that their previous colleagues are all of a sudden asking why Brad, who used to be such a cool person, is presently shouting at them since they were five idiotic minutes late to the meeting. Brad's not cool any longer. In any case, that is an alternate article.) On the off chance that you need to set your star entertainers up for achievement when you elevate them to initiative, the answer is basic:
Post a Comment